Here at Incoming BYTES we wish everyone the best for the holiday season. We hope you had a wonderful, peaceful Christmas holiday, and for 2011, we wish you a safe, very Happy and prosperous New Year!
Here comes 2011. Some view the new year in fear and trepidation, others with open arms, accepting their lot in life whatever it may be. How about you? What are your dreams? What do you want to happen, what can you expect to happen, and what shall we individually learn from those events? Will we endeavor to be more faithful to God, become more intelligent, and actually use the brains we are each given? Shall we abandon the norm of acceptance of all we are handed, to rebel seriously, --and without hesitation, try to change things for the better? What are you going to MAKE happen? Casual observation suggests that society may, in apathy, continue to ignore what is substantially important in life.
I must admit it is more fun to watch television and “be entertained” rather than think about difficult subjects. It is easier to watch “Jeopardy” than it is to actually think and plan quantum change in our own lives.
Perhaps we should watch less television, and thereby kill two birds with one stone, make the mind more active and lessen the amount of brainwashing that comes our way at the same time. Make no mistake about it, just as one example, we are conditioned and brainwashed to become perfect shoppers, as Black Friday and Christmas prove annually.
Must we as a society continue to accept the commercial wishes of the powerful, malignant and greedy, and the curious political burden of undemocratic democracy that is cast upon us?
Are we being desensitized and trained to “accept” corrupt, unsatisfactory political solutions and gargantuan 'big money' environmental disasters? Are we being rapidly prepared for “third world” conditions of poverty even as the international rich grow ever richer? Is universal, one-world government at hand? Do you fear the future? People kept in a state of fear are easier to control.
I believe we should not only have high expectations, but question what those expectations should be. Let us not be told what our expectations should be, but decide for ourselves. It is not wrong to dream of better. Is it not wrong to expect better in real life. It is not wrong to expect good health care, fairness, justice, political honesty, a healthy environment, a good life and ultimately, personal happiness.
From the 365.242199 days of civilization we survived in 2010, hopefully we have gained a modicum of knowledge, learned from the collective human experience, cobbled together some new ideas, and perhaps rediscovered some pearls of wisdom from the past, --but perhaps we should also take a serious look at what we really accomplished to date? Have we met all of our goals, inspired dreams in others and encouraged thought?
Perhaps we have planted a few innocuous, strange seeds ourselves that may grow unnoticed at our feet or in the minds of others. Perhaps others will think because of something you said, or an idea you offered. I hope so. Will our western society become responsible, more reflective and reactive to make necessary changes to provide betterment, --in fact assure life for all human beings on the face of the earth?
The question is, what have we done collectively and as individuals to ensure that we continue to exist, and what can we do in 2011 to change things for the better?
Shall we make a list of “New Year’s Resolutions” only to abandon them, as usual, within a few weeks, or even days? It is trendy to make a list and chuck it every year, but is it more appropriate to write a “bucket list” of lifetime objectives and really stick to them? We shall see.
Happy New Year!
p.s. Please do not drink and drive!
About this blog
Incoming BYTES contains highly variable subject matter including commentary on the mundane, the extraordinary and even controversial issues. At Incoming BYTES we want YOU to think...if you dare...
Followers
Friday, December 31, 2010
Tuesday, December 28, 2010
The Christmas Shopping Experiment.
From Incoming BYTES we hope everyone had a wonderful Christmas!
This year I discovered that carefully exploring the market a few days ahead of the holiday itself, specifically without buying anything at all, paid off. It actually made it easier to go out and buy something, a specific something, even during those last commercially-pumped, frenetic days just before Christmas.
Maybe taking “ Time for a Last Minute Christmas Reality Check” wasn’t such a bad concept. It somehow seemed more logical to buy a planned present rather than “just go shopping and buy on impulse”. It seemed to be a better idea to stay focused than just wander, somewhat stunned by hype and hurry, into commercial traps aimlessly, one after the other.
In practice, it did seem easier to stay focused on the job at hand and actually resist the distraction of commercial Christmas hype --than it had in previous years.
The net result? A surprising reduction in spending of approximately 50% occurred. Less money was spent foolishly on impulse. Less money was spent foolishly to quell imaginary last minute shopping “gift size” anxiety. Fewer dollars were spent on unnecessary purchases. Perhaps less money was even used to soothe guilt anxiety left over from last year.
Best of all, there IS far less debt to face in January.
I wonder if there is a genuinely profitable object lesson to be considered here? Was this a personal best borne of rebellion, because of meticulous planning and logic, or just skepticism and recognition of the fact that unfair and overbearing commercial retailing practices are exacting a terrible toll on society under the guise of a "holiday"?
Let’s try this on for size. The plan resulted in more thoughtful presents, less stress, an intact bank account and best of all, fewer bills to deal with. I did not spend money I do not have. I did not spend next month’s mortgage payment, rent, or grocery money pretending to be Santa.
The big question is, did it detract from the fun and enjoyment of the season itself? Happily, no!
Rejoice! It seems that either we have an improved Christmas shopping strategy, --or have just become older and wiser.
This year I discovered that carefully exploring the market a few days ahead of the holiday itself, specifically without buying anything at all, paid off. It actually made it easier to go out and buy something, a specific something, even during those last commercially-pumped, frenetic days just before Christmas.
Maybe taking “ Time for a Last Minute Christmas Reality Check” wasn’t such a bad concept. It somehow seemed more logical to buy a planned present rather than “just go shopping and buy on impulse”. It seemed to be a better idea to stay focused than just wander, somewhat stunned by hype and hurry, into commercial traps aimlessly, one after the other.
In practice, it did seem easier to stay focused on the job at hand and actually resist the distraction of commercial Christmas hype --than it had in previous years.
The net result? A surprising reduction in spending of approximately 50% occurred. Less money was spent foolishly on impulse. Less money was spent foolishly to quell imaginary last minute shopping “gift size” anxiety. Fewer dollars were spent on unnecessary purchases. Perhaps less money was even used to soothe guilt anxiety left over from last year.
Best of all, there IS far less debt to face in January.
I wonder if there is a genuinely profitable object lesson to be considered here? Was this a personal best borne of rebellion, because of meticulous planning and logic, or just skepticism and recognition of the fact that unfair and overbearing commercial retailing practices are exacting a terrible toll on society under the guise of a "holiday"?
Let’s try this on for size. The plan resulted in more thoughtful presents, less stress, an intact bank account and best of all, fewer bills to deal with. I did not spend money I do not have. I did not spend next month’s mortgage payment, rent, or grocery money pretending to be Santa.
The big question is, did it detract from the fun and enjoyment of the season itself? Happily, no!
Rejoice! It seems that either we have an improved Christmas shopping strategy, --or have just become older and wiser.
Monday, December 20, 2010
Time for a Last Minute Christmas Reality Check
Christmas Shopping in Blister photo by wlk photography |
Bah, Humbug ! I have to run to the mall for some last-minute gifts. With only a few days left before the big day, procrastinators beware. It really is time to scurry around for those precious gifts, so hurry, beat the Dec. 24th rush, listen to the nice Christmas music, and do that last minute shopping. Get the perfect gift. Spend that money.
Perhaps there really are some lost opportunities not available to you again until next year, like those you missed on Black Friday, which, conveniently, is another artificial and manufactured retail trap for the gullible.
When you do get to the mall, find a parking spot and shop frantically, are you being encouraged to panic and buy without thinking? Are you being taken advantage of by retailers using the psychology of Christmas and encouraged to spend more money than you can really afford as we are increasingly encouraged to do every year?
The “last minute rush” and panic is built upon guilt. The Christmas season is pushed upon us just after Hallowe’en, and retailers everywhere delight in pushing our buttons. The psychology of Christmas sales. A two-month shopping spree, the retailing game is at it’s best and coincidentally, the most profitable. Don’t think, just spend. Did your brother give you a better gift than you gave him last year? Did you forget your cousin completely, so have to make up for it this year? Did you spend more on your son than on your daughter? How about your sister? Was there an element of favoritism involved and the guilt that lasted all year has to be “fixed” with that perfect gift this year? How about dear old Mom? Nothing is too good for Mom, everybody knows that.
Did you change your mind at the last minute and decide “those” gifts were not expensive enough, and were not “meaningful enough" so you need more? Did your best friend buy you something extravagant and you have to make up for it this year? Do you have to sell your soul for the lavish gift of your dreams for your significant other? Will it finally be a “perfect Christmas “ if you can only spend enough?
Are you running out of time? Buy this, grab that, and quickly....I can run the credit card up and worry about it in January. Stop.
Maybe it IS time for a reality check.
Let us slow down, breathe deeply and recognize that today’s Christmas retailing business is structured and built only for commercial profit. Retailing has virtually nothing to do with promoting peace and goodwill or “ helping you”. Retailers are not showing you the real meaning of Christmas with “warm and fuzzy” tear-jerking home-coming promotions so common at this time of year. “The perfect gift solves everything” according to the retailer. As long as it is expensive enough.
“Merry Christmas, Mom”, as the returning, surprised, and obviously lonely mother sees how beautiful the “perfect commercial products” from XYZ have made her home look. Someone that has not bothered to visit all year has showed up, done the work and spent money they probably needed for their child’s clothing, but so what? It is the retail glitz that counts. The warm and fuzzy moment. Is that any better? No.
It plays upon the psychology of Christmas and the minds of the guilty. Unfair practice? Yes, but retailing knows no bounds.
In more relaxed times, Christmas had meaning. There were small, individual hand-made presents, arts and carefully crafted items that were specially made for the delighted individual to whom they would be presented . Perhaps they were made even months prior to the big event. Only if one failed to be thoughtful, constructive, and well organized would one have to dash to the market in chagrin at the last minute to find something, anything, to “fill the gap” for the “missing” present. Buying a “store-made” gift was the exception, not the command performance it is today. “Home-made” gifts are shown to be less glitzy than “bought” ones are, and promoted to be deemed of lesser value.
Lesser value? “Folk art”, hand-made gifts and objects from 60 to 100 years old or older may command prices in the tens of thousands of dollars today. Compare that to a cheap ‘similar gift” made in Japan or China. No such comparison will be available 60 years from now, since the cheap import would have been long discarded as trash.
The best price of the year is deep-discounted by desperate retailers trying to top off annual sales and maximize profit, -- not to do you any favours. How can a product be worth $ 99.50 all year, and then suddenly be a “once in a lifetime opportunity ” at $19.95 just because “Christmas” came along? A little bit of skepticism is in order.
The fact is, that gift you have the sudden urge to buy was probably manufactured in China for mere pennies, and the real cost of it may have been your job, or that of your neighbour. Think for yourselves.
It is Christmas, sure, there may only be a few days of retailer “magic” left, but that really is enough time to think for yourself. Your smarter better half may even love you even more when you show her the zero balance on your credit card come January.
I’m off to the mall. Gotta get that perfect present. I could have made something nice instead. Why didn’t I think of this four months ago?
Bah, Humbug!
Thursday, December 16, 2010
North America...Rent this Idea !
Audi A2 photo by Audi |
At Incoming BYTES, we believe it appropriate to offer cutting criticism and poke sharply at questionable events, issues and projects, especially where justifiable criticism is earned.
It is equally an excellent idea to point out the clever, intelligent and the good. Well, good things very worthy of note are happening in Paris, the City of Lights.
Paris will be the first city in the world to offer a major car-sharing program. Yes, you read it right, a car-sharing program. Paris has had a successful bicycle-sharing program for three years and has cleverly decided to pioneer a car-sharing program featuring compact electric cars.
How smart is that? Very.
Initially, some 3,000 4-seat electric cars will be located at 1200 docking locations throughout the city of Paris. Pick it up here, and leave it there. Reserve the car in advance, drive all over, and return it to any station handy. The driver needs the mandatory driver’s license and an annual subscription and security deposit.
How much more clever could that concept be? The program will be operational by the end of 2011. The City of Paris is to be congratulated on their foresight and progressive plan.
Way to go, Paris !
Removing 3,000 gasoline-driven vehicles from the streets is a sound environmental initiative.
Electric vehicles are clean, quiet, and efficient. Battery technology can only get better. The newest battery technology by a German company, DBM Energy, allows an electric vehicle to be charged fully in 6 minutes or less and driven 375 miles at 55mph. That should be enough range for almost everyone. The ‘rent and drop at any location' is inherently clever.
This is better than just a “good” idea. It is an idea whose time has arrived.
Now all we need are a few clever Canadian and Americans entrepreneurs to “discover” the concept and put it into action. Hopefully, action that will be coming to a city near you –and the sooner the better.
Tuesday, December 14, 2010
Does This Thing Really Fly?
Avro ARROW CF105 Fighter 1959 photo courtesy of ArtEyePhoto |
I would not care to have the reader believe that Incoming Bytes is eternally earth-bound and contains only skepticism or criticism, or that it is intended to be so at all times, but the astute reader will also recognize with incoming news articles, bits and bytes of information, timing is everything. Specific commentary is often better placed immediately. So be it today. Recent announcement by Ottawa that Pratt & Whitney is being loaned $300 million taxpayer dollars “to create and maintain” jobs is worthy of just that commentary, and more.
Money itself is not the issue. Governments do waste money. The loan itself, funded by the taxpayer, is not the issue. It is mere peanuts compared to the unnecessary billion-dollar long gun registry, the unnecessary billion-dollar G-20 Summit security bill, and other just-as-creative but unnecessary government incentives, ad nauseam.
Don’t misunderstand, most Canadians will applaud the idea and agree the ‘creation and maintenance of jobs” is a wonderful thing, indeed, it is a worthy goal and mandate of any government, but in recalling the past and comparing it to the present, I do wonder. The memory is long, and curiosity often gets the better of me. The shadows of political backtracking, inconsistency, non-transparency, inexplicable decisions, foolishness and bureaucratic hypocrisy are seemingly brought to the fore.
In many ways it is a shame that the modern Wikileaks was not fully functional in 1959. That was the year the AVRO Arrow was shot down, not by enemy fighters or terrorists, but by Canada’s own slightly frumpy job-maker and his helpers who seemingly shot Canada squarely in the foot as they killed off a potential multi-trillion dollar industry. Fifty-one years after the AVRO Arrow, -- are the Conservatives changing their minds? How about some tongue-in-the-cheek? Can this bird fly? The Arrow was more than capable of flight at Mach 2.0 at 50,000 ft.
For anyone that has any meaningful recollection of the aircraft industry in Canada, today’s announcement must bring to mind the absolute contradiction in government policy with the willful and unprecedented destruction of the aircraft industry by the same Conservative government on February 20th, 1959 .
On that date, the highly successful Canadian aircraft and aerospace industry was dealt a mortal blow, as the highly advanced CF-105 AVRO Arrow fighter program was scrapped with little notice,and seemingly little justification then, or since that sad event.
That government decision was disastrous. Fourteen thousand aircraft workers, designers, aerospace engineers and hundreds of thousands of spin-off jobs disappeared overnight, as successfully-tested prototypes of the Arrows on the tarmac at A.V. Roe were ordered quickly chopped into little pieces to be sent for scrap metal and engineering drawings and plans were ordered destroyed. Arrow engineers quickly drifted south to the US industry.
The ARROW was proven to be a technically-advanced, performance-superior aircraft that was faster, equipped with weaponry that is still used today, and it’s performance remained unequaled by any foreign fighter aircraft until the mid-1980's. With a substantial market potential for both the aircraft itself and the powerful, all-Canadian Iroquois engine, the aircraft was all-Canadian and the Canadian aerospace industry was totally viable until the then Prime-Minister of Canada, John Diefenbaker and his Conservative government shot it down, --if only to make the American aerospace industry successful instead.
What happened, and what was the REAL reason? Worse yet, at what cost was such an arbitrary, foolish decision made?
Just for the record, Pratt& Whitney is reportedly using that loan to employ 200 more engineers to develop a lighter, more powerful engine, possibly even to be used in the “new” F-35's Canada will be purchasing.
Go figure.
Maybe the backwash from that governmental Arrow boo-boo has finally caught up. Extremely expensive American F-35's will now be purchased from the US Aerospace industry to replace the prohibitively expensive but aging American F-18's previously purchased from the US Aerospace industry. Is there any lesson to be observed here?
Will this bird fly, or is the latest loan an official admission that the fateful decision made 51 years ago to kill the Arrow was a “mistake” and has finally come home to roost?
Sunday, December 12, 2010
Get a Horse ?
On the Road to Blister photo by WLK Photography |
Might we be reverting to horse & buggy days in North America much sooner than expected? Whether in Toronto, Dallas, or in “Twixley”, an imaginary village in Morgidoo’s Christmas Carol, it strikes me that fuel must ultimately be affordable if it is to be purchased at all. Does that make sense?
I cannot imagine any logical reason why the richest corporations in the world might need more money for crude oil other than to satiate endless greed, but at the current OPEC meeting in Ecuador, it is likely the collective OPEC eye has been secretly attached to the $100.00/barrel benchmark with crazy glue if only because the rest of the world will meekly accept it.
According to some, that price is “affordable”. Really?
Meanwhile, OPEC is estimated by the US Department of Energy to have suffered through a miserable year, with a paltry increase in profits,-- $750B -- only 32% more than in 2009.
Not enough money? My eyes are misting with sympathy already.
Is there ever enough profit in the petroleum industry? Our eyes may be soon be smarting from oil fumes, our lungs may be burning from sour gas wells, and billions of essential life forms continue to die from sloppy, ecologically disastrous spills and failures in the industry, but profit for the greedy will never seemingly be “enough.”
Apparently there is never enough oil used, either, and few people realize that the automotive industry was borne out of the necessity to use up all that crude oil. We must therefore immediately devise more creative ways to consume oil faster since it “reportedly” disappears within a few weeks like magic when it is spilled into Gulf sea water and onto pristine beaches.
I wonder how fast oil will disappear in the freezing waters of the Arctic? Shall delusion prevent the first Arctic well blowout, guaranteed to happen in real life, and shall we all breathe a sigh of relief as it freezes into solid floating islands of oil? Perhaps the industry will creatively suggest it will help polar bears survive? Oil packs instead of pristine ice packs. How helpful. How absolutely predictable.
How shall we ever keep up the good work? National television ads, courtesy of Cenovus Energy are currently advertising how important oil “ is”. Perhaps they feel additional brainwashing of the North American consumer is essential to justify their multi-billion dollar expansion program in the oil sands. Why waste advertising money on Canadians, when the oil will soon be going to China? Better expand quickly , there is an estimated requirement for 2011 of only 90 million barrels per day, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA), but why not go for 100 million barrels per day, or 200 million barrels per day, let us use it faster, get it all over that much sooner and make even bigger profits? Perhaps with the total collapse of the petroleum industry, sanity can return to civilization?
It is little wonder Alberta is proceeding full speed ahead with the questionable Athabasca Oil sands projects and planning pipelines to the west coast. The necessary supertankers shall be plying pristine coastal waters ever so carefully just like the Exxon Valdez did, if only to enable shipping Alberta’s oil to China. Profit is surely more important than life itself. That guaranteed potential of ecological disaster will help the greening of Mother Earth in Alberta and ensure the supply of mutated fish for all. Perhaps economic greed drives both stupidity and insane irresponsibility?
Happily, back at the meeting of OPEC ministers no “immediate” intention of raising crude oil prices or changing crude production quotas has been announced at this moment, a move hardly necessary since they have been known to cheat in the game of quotas anyway, but OPEC producers are certainly not outwitting one another in any bid to lower prices either.
Although economic conditions in the good old USA and Europe are substantially dampened at the moment with the global meltdown, international bailouts and the shady shell games taking place in all things financial, with China’s burgeoning economy in an unprecedented growth cycle --in spite of an almost unheard of growth rate and now a 5.1 % inflation rate, it is quite predictable the busy Chinese will consume more oil, store more oil, and demand more oil, driving total demand and international prices ever higher.
Should we carefully avoid mentioning India in the same breath, which now may be the fastest growing economy in the world? In India, modern life is taking hold. Low-end “family” cars at a retail cost of $2,000 per vehicles are coming out soon, courtesy of Tata Motors. Literally millions of them will be plying cow-paths in the very near future, with happy owners imagining they are finally living the American dream of owning a car, --and simultaneously lining up for gasoline, each tiny vehicle spewing pollution into the air in a gargantuan collective effort to catch up to the Chinese, who are already suffocating themselves in the worst industrial pollution in existence.
We are all admittedly part of the problem, but even at that, I fail to see why in Canada, our proud oil producing nation, gasoline must be $1.29/liter, which is $5.80 per Imperial gallon.
With crude prices close to $90.00/barrel already and difficult winter conditions upon us, the die is likely cast, suck it up, it will go even higher--- but in Venezuela, another oil-producing nation, gasoline is sold for mere cents/liter to it’s citizens, and happy Hugo wants $100 USD per barrel or better yet, even more, presumably to teach all North Americans the ultimate lesson in frugality.
We must therefore remain slaves to OPEC and the petroleum industry and pay the piper, or alternatively, grow as an advanced civilization, dream of using common sense, become smarter, and go electric. Electric vehicles are viable and have been since gasoline was invented.
Either that or do like the gentle folk in Twixley, and just get a horse.
Labels:
Alberta,
Cenovus Energy,
ecology,
electric car,
Exxon Valdez,
frugality,
fuel,
gasoline prices,
global meltdown,
Gulf,
horse,
IEA,
oil,
oil sands,
OPEC,
polar bears,
profit
Thursday, December 9, 2010
Narrow Tires, Big Snow in Blister
Blister General Store photo by wlk photography |
Shall we pine for the old days when a Model 'T 'and other choice vintage vehicles drove through heavy snow easily because they had very tall, narrow tires?
The old cars were solid, weighed far more, and displayed much higher clearance than modern vehicles.
It is snowing as we speak; hopefully in the morning it shall not look like the snow in Morgidoo’s village. Even the Blister General Store is closed. Perhaps the price of gasoline hasn’t been raised there yet, -or over in the village of 'Twill, a few miles across the hills.
Fantasy and creativity and magic are all an essential part of the human psyche. Shall we close our eyes and dream?
Morgidoo's Christmas Carol is coming soon... Don't forget to blink...
The Christmas Shop at Blister photo by wlk photography |
Tuesday, December 7, 2010
Got Gas, Mr. Grinch?
BIG OIL photo by r.a. kukkee 2010 |
With winter close to full swing and the Christmas season fast approaching, I thought, (or more likely imagined, suffering from a lack of natural sunshine ), that Corporate good-will might flare up for a change ('Tis the season to be jolly and all that !)
It seems I guessed wrong. Instead, it appears that corporate profits remain their primary concern, and the Grinch himself is flailing about with much gusto in one sector in spite of the spirit of the season, or the stifled North American economy.
Only a few days ago the price of gasoline once again skyrocketed like magic, inexplicably and forcefully, just in time for Santa to stuff great bags of cash into the bulging coffers, caves and penthouse apartments of the richest and most powerful corporate elite in the world. Who else could that be, but the Petroleum Industry?
The price of gasoline at the pump jumped more than ten cents per liter, from $1.09 per liter to over $1.20 per liter within a day. Instantly. Why did the price jump sky-high? I wonder how that happens?
I am also curious to know 'who' actually makes the calls to set the new universal price we see almost immediately at the pumps, regardless of brand.
Let us imagine for a moment THAT mysterious “Mr. Who” is on the telephone.
“ Hello? Is this Joe’s Gas station? You got gas? Surprise! Your gas is a new, improved price starting right now!”
“....... But Sir, what about the gas in the tanks here, should I sell it at the old price?”
“Are you kidding, Joe? You a bit stupid or something? Do as you’re told, don’t ask questions, jack up the price on it too, why not?” Mr. Who orders with disdain, “After all, what are the peasants going to do about it?” Mr. Who, ( is he related to the Grinch, by any chance? ) , smirks happily and hangs up.
What just happened at Joe’s Gas station seems to have happened everywhere. How can that be? How can gasoline prices possibly be so closely orchestrated?
According to www.Oilprice.com, the price of crude oil was $89.02 as of Dec. 6th at 10.00 a.m. EST. (1)., having risen from approximately $85.00 a few days previously. That equates to a price increase of $4.00 US for a whole barrel of crude oil.
One must immediately wonder how a $4.00 increase in the price of a barrel of crude oil equates to a pump price increases of a half-buck per gallon for gasoline? The fact is, it does NOT. Did all petroleum industry executives fail to get a passing grade in arithmetic in school? Perhaps that’s the problem. Perhaps we should calculate it for them.
Let’s see....We know that about 20 US gallons ( 75.70 liters) of gasoline is produced from each barrel of crude oil. Crude oil is not all made into gasoline. Other products such as diesel fuel, home heating oil, and various other oils and lubricants are ALSO made from the same barrel of crude oil
Any doubt about that? See for yourself. Check them out at: http://www.txoga.org/articles/308/1/WHAT-A-BARREL-OF-CRUDE-OIL-MAKES
Regardless, and totally ignoring price increases on other products listed, the recent price increase at your local gas pumps infers there was an increase of about $8.00 per barrel of crude oil.
---But wait, Virginia, the real price increase for raw crude oil in that same time period, as we now know, was only about $4.00 per barrel.
Clearly a problem exists. Does price gouging by error, or by design? Executive ineptitude, or just willful, blatant greed? Organized criminal activity? Government control? Eyebrow- raising cooperation and a wink between oil-producing nations? Perhaps the reader has other suggestions.
Who is assigned the responsibility of calculating the price of gasoline, and how does it magically become the new, virtually universal price?
Is this all part of the cute board game called Monopoly?
Should any thinking individual be expected to actually believe there are not cooperative and behind-the scenes forces controlling prices at the gasoline pump? Huge and instantaneous price increases just do not magically happen, and there is one certainty. The imagination is sorely over-worked to believe it is “competition”.
Vehement denial of unfair practice is the standard response in any investigation of price-fixing, monopolistic practices or price-setting agreements by Big Oil.
The classic defense offered includes arbitrary excuses historically used to justify windfall profits.
It is such good fortune we suffer to know why we are being robbed.
The search for answers becomes a quick spin on a “Wheel of Fortune” for which the consumer must both play and pay.
The wheel is spinning.... automobile owners everywhere are waiting at the pump with abated breath.....Which of these wonderful excuses shall be offered this time?
Official List of Excuses and Justifications for Windfall Profits
- The price of crude oil at the pump (Set by Mr. Who?)
- Global prices (Controlled by Mr. Who?)
- Low supplies (Controlled by Mr. Who?)
- OPEC policy and agreement changes ( Controlled by Mr. Who?)
- Corporate losses. ( Details to be offered by Mr. Who? )
- The bad economy
- Competition (we may have to laugh about that one)
- Bad weather
- Drilling and exploration costs
- Refinery fires and equipment failures
- The unstable Mid-East and it’s perpetual political unrest, the war against terror (ad infinitum)
- Shipping accidents ( the Exxon Valdez, was that oil collected in 5-gallon buckets for resale?....)
- Oil spills and rig fires ( BP Gulf --2010 --all that spilled crude oil in the gulf just “happily” disappeared after a few weeks?)
- Government taxes on gasoline ( the most famous excuse offered in Canada )
- Corporate greed
- Excessive Profits
- Multi-million dollar year-end bonuses for chief executive officers.
- Creative pricing agreements
We have but one question for the petroleum industry: Which excuse are you going to use this time? Not that it matters. At this time of the year even Santa himself would have to call your actions unethical, opportunistic, and monopolistic price gouging.
Naughty, naughty, naughty. Santa’s list is getting longer by the day.
###
Sunday, December 5, 2010
The Beginning
Incoming BYTES photo by r.a. kukkee |
It is with some excitement and trepidation I have finally taken it upon myself to speak my mind and write a blog. A real blog. Incoming Bytes, powered by the light of the early morning sun....
What will Incoming BYTES be about?
Everything. Everything that piques the curiosity, touches the heart, outrages, or offends the soul. Justice, societal mores, the environment, social affairs, news, events, tragedy and triumph. I will ask questions. I will not only question, but interpret, infer, critique, and at times praise what I observe. I may provide a perceived answer or two, or leave that job to the reader. I may at times condemn or annoy shamelessly. Perhaps controversy shall arise at times, and offend, even though offense is not specifically intended. Perhaps offense is actually earned upon occasion and if that is the case, so be it.
Above all, I will express my personal opinion with HONESTY.
The second question that must come to the fore should probably be: “Why?”
Why bother to speak out? The fact of the matter remains, in Utopia, and modern suburbia, ordinary individuals should expect to be happy and pleased with what they see around them. If they make observations that make them become angry and fail to comment, or simply do not bother to address lack of ethics, poverty, crime, and daily issues, why expect miracles? Instead, observe events and offer positive ideas for change, or we cannot expect any change for the better.
Societal pressure at times favours the status quo, does it not? Look out of the window in your neighbourhood. Listen to your children, co-workers, the media and observe. Clearly quantum change for the better is needed in North America and world-wide.
It took quite some time to firmly decide that writing a web log could be a suitable forum that can promote discussion. Again, write about what? The simple answer is, “literally everything”. Everything that amazes or surprises. New discoveries. Everything that prickles the mind or the soul. Everything that excites, amazes, causes creative juices to flow, consternation and anxiety, or offends the sense of justice. What offends you? What excites you? What piques your interest? What makes you happy? What enrages you to the very core of your being? Please leave a comment.
* By the way, we believe it possible to express forceful opinion without the use of invectives and foul language. Such language and offensive, hateful commentary will be obliterated mercilessly from comments. If the reader is angry, he or she is requested to take time out, return later, and leave an insightful comment in the form of civilized dialogue.
Will Incoming BYTES be successful? That decision is left to the reader. Come again soon.
*Note from North of Lake Superior: In spite of the current interest in global warming, in Northwestern Ontario it seems it has not arrived, --at least not today. It is winter, cold and dry, and there is a wonderful blanket of snow for kids of all ages to play in.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)