The internet happens to be an integral and important tool for communication in the life of a writer,
like it or not.
Right now I'm not liking it much. I have bad internet service, how about you?
Access to the internet, to the outside world, data, news, websites, research, culture, information of all kinds --and communication with people-- is indispensable.
We live in North America, supposedly the most communications-advanced countries in the world, so why is internet service so bad?
Not being located in a big city does have it's disadvantages, like having a very limited choice of
Internet Service Providers. Fine.
Service providers are communication giants that buy broadband width to sell internet access to consumers in the form of 'dial-up, ( tying up your 'land line' telephone),
broadband DSL, (digital subscriber line),
cable subscription,
wireless cellular service via tower coverage, or
directly via satellite to their customers.
After surviving with 'dial-up' speed (26KB/second) for about $20.00 per month, being offered
Xplornet's Kazaam package 0.5MBps for about $60.00 a month via satellite by Xplornet Internet Services seemed to be modernization, logical progress, reasonable and timely.
Subsequent testing however, showed that speeds promised were seldom achieved by the satellite system, and
when the service was recently cancelled in absolute
rage frustration, average speeds of 19 to 20 KB/sec and even outrageously pathetic speeds as low as
670 Bytes---NOT KILOBYTES--were recorded. Their 'normal speed' was no better than land-line dial-up--in fact, often far, FAR worse.
Xplornet offered the excuse that they have a 'fair use' policy of throttling service when 'fair use' is exceeded by any customer. Their version of fair use appears to be,
turn on the computer, and the 'fair use policy' kicks in.
First turned on, and instantly tested showed speeds of 0.49Mbps, and a half hour later, speeds were typically down to 20KBps. Initial start-up speeds were also measured at less than 0.25KB/sec.
Their first excuse version of 'fair use' was throttling the internet speed down to 50% of speed promised ---for 30 minutes-- after 24Mb of data is downloaded by the customer.
Let's keep in mind, here at Incoming Bytes I do NOT download movies from Netflix, or any huge files other than essential program updates, for example, downloading an update for AVG virus software (some 80Mb)took all day
Little wonder, when the download speed was as low as 1.6KB/second, even dropping at one point to 670 BYTES per second.
I am not a happy internet user. We don't have to wonder why.
Subsequent communication with Xplornet offered the
new magic excuse of 25% of maximum speed (magically reduced from 50%) now being the
punishment 'throttled speed'
inflicted allowed for 'fair use'.
Apparently these people are also
mathematically-challenged or incredibly arrogant. Perhaps both.
Since when does 1.6KB transfer rate = 25% of the 63KB transfer rate which equals their --promised speed of 0.5Mbps internet speed?
When does service being "unavailable" for two or three hours, or two or three DAYS equal 'fair use' ? They actually had the gall to state that the recorded speeds fell within their 'guidelines'.
By the way, XPLORNET tested the equipment all the way to my modem --and said it was functioning 'perfectly' or 'phenomenally'. How about that?
The recorded results reveal a test NOT throttled.
No matter. In the simple minds of the ISP,
stupid consumers could not be aware of such devious details....
The fact IS, there is lack of ethics involved. They have purchased a tiny bandwidth and continue to jamb ever more customers onto it over the last few years, charging everyone either approximately $59.95 a month or $79.99 a month, depending upon the
throttled plan chosen.
The satellite service became progressively worse, at times not useable --and not even available.
The SAME company is now urgently "renting" their equipment for $5.00/month to try to nab more
fools customers.
Is this just bad service by one unethical company or is it a fraudulent, common practice?
Am I, the customer, allowed to throttle the $60.00 per month payment based on the CRAPPY non-service I have received? No.
I have asked for a refund for the NON-service. Will they send me a refund willingly? NO. Will their service improve? NO.
Needless to say, I CANCELLED the lousy service from XPLORNET and have blocked ANY further payment to this unethical, so-called "internet service provider".
I am now testing the 'Rocket Hub' which is a wireless system based on the cellular-phone system. The service speed has at times shot up to 4.7MB/sec download speed -it is supposed to go up to over 7.0Mbps --but depending on the load on the cell system, also drops off 'at or equal to ' the 0.50MB, the 'fast' speed offered by the sick satellite system. Imagine that. I have 14 days to evaluate it.
Technology is wonderful until it fails to work, or is deviously 'throttled' by the company in an unethical attempt to gouge more money from customers wanting better service.
By the way, the last communication I received from XPLORNET suggested I buy their "KAZOOM" package, at 1.0MBps --subject to the same throttling policy.
Get it? Apparently, this clever company believes consumers are
IDIOTS uninformed.
The Federal CRTC (Canadian Radio Television Communications) has reportedly ordered
Rogers to halt the practice of 'throttling' internet speed. Rogers may even have to reimburse consumers.
Throttling internet speed is now illegal, or soon will be.
I wonder how long it will take XPLORNET to get the message?
---OOPS....not long ! The CRTC will soon know about XPLORNET. For the uninformed, they are the handy Federal Government people that review ISP licenses in Canada. Consumer and Corporate Affairs will soon know about it too. Isn't that nice?
Not being one to shirk the obligations of being a good consumer,
I have filed a mad consumer complaint with my Federal Member of Parliament, including recorded test data. I am such a helpful fellow.
So, aside from "what else is new?", the questions of the day around here must be:
How fast is YOUR internet working? Is it being unfairly throttled too?
Go to: speedtest.primus.ca or an equivalent service. You can also instantly Google 'internet speed test" -- and test it yourself.
You'll figure it out. |It's simple. Press the button, and read the results. Compare them to what your ISP provider 'promised' you.
Are you, too, getting inexplicably bad service and not getting what you are paying for? You may be surprised.
The fact is, I'm a consumer, I'm a writer, and I'm mad as hell --and I am not taking it any more. Enough is enough. Soon we'll be occupying something.
Meantime, we'll smile and wait for our BIG REFUND when the new CRTC ruling comes into effect with
"No throttling allowed".
Is that incoming I hear?
that's my story and I'm sticking to it.